Eldrick Picture..good?bad? depends?
The Golfing Machine - Advanced
|

12-06-2011, 10:06 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
Is this better...worse....or just different?

__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:18 PM
|
|
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 116
|
|
|
Impossible for someone to say this is good or bad by itself depending on so many other factors........but IMHO as of now, Tiger is still struggling with driving because he has too much lean. Foley changed the pivot but he kept the lean /lag required from when the pivot was back. Takes a lot of up and back to line that up from that picture and very difficult to be consistent.
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:36 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
|
Snap vs Sweep
Perhaps why Hogan could hit it in the Fairway and perhaps why Tiger can hit it 320.
The game has sure changed, perhaps hitting it 320 is more important than finding fairways?
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
Originally Posted by JTillery
|
|
Impossible for someone to say this is good or bad by itself depending on so many other factors........but IMHO as of now, Tiger is still struggling with driving because he has too much lean. Foley changed the pivot but he kept the lean /lag required from when the pivot was back. Takes a lot of up and back to line that up from that picture and very difficult to be consistent.
|
JT, I've not seen Blake's swing. Which picture would be be more similar to?
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:46 PM
|
|
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 116
|
|
|
For a stock shot, Mr. Hogan
Even though the camera angle is bad, that is too much angle for that pivot unless were hitting low cuts.
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:54 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
Originally Posted by JTillery
|
|
Impossible for someone to say this is good or bad by itself depending on so many other factors........but IMHO as of now, Tiger is still struggling with driving because he has too much lean. Foley changed the pivot but he kept the lean /lag required from when the pivot was back. Takes a lot of up and back to line that up from that picture and very difficult to be consistent.
|
What factors? Can they not be defined?
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

12-06-2011, 10:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
Originally Posted by KevCarter
|
Snap vs Sweep
Perhaps why Hogan could hit it in the Fairway and perhaps why Tiger can hit it 320.
The game has sure changed, perhaps hitting it 320 is more important than finding fairways?
Kevin
|
So Hogan couldn't hit it 320 if weilding the same implement because he doesn't hit the picture? Is the assumption here that that picture produces more speed and/or power? If so...how come?
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

12-06-2011, 11:00 PM
|
|
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 116
|
|
|
Sure! Just not from a still photo.....that one in particular
Whether or not that's a "good" position would depend on (1)what type of shot he is trying to hit there:bullet-good position ......high draw: not so much
PLANE ANGLE, BALL POSITION, LEAN, AND WEIGHT SHIFT OR PIVOT IN GENERAL ARE ALL HUGE FACTORS that are intertwined and all have a role in the outcome of the overall pattern. To simply say this angle is good or bad is just SO incomplete.
Last edited by JTillery : 12-06-2011 at 11:57 PM.
|
|

12-06-2011, 11:08 PM
|
 |
Lynn Blake Certified Associate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,955
|
|
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket
|
|
So Hogan couldn't hit it 320 if weilding the same implement because he doesn't hit the picture? Is the assumption here that that picture produces more speed and/or power? If so...how come?
|
I've heard both sides of how long Hogan would be with today's equipment. We'll never know. I believe the guys today don't have to posess the precision they did in Hogan's day. Equipment is the great equalizer...
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
ALIGNMENT G.O.L.F.
|
|

12-06-2011, 11:20 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
Originally Posted by JTillery
|
Sure! Just not from a still photo.....that one in particular
Whether or not that's a "good" position would depend on (1)what type of shot he is trying to hit there:bullet-good position ......high draw bomb:bad position
(2) for a stock tee ball and neutral type trajectory and shape, PLANE ANGLE, BALL POSITION, AND WEIGHT SHIFT OR PIVOT IN GENERAL BECOME HUGE FACTORS
|
to your (1)So are we to assume that draws and high are "out" from here? Others in the thread are covetous of this photo....Eldrick can't hit it high or draw it from here? If so why?
to your (2) is this not a "stock" position?
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.
|
| |