[HungryBear]

Re Aiming Point (PROCEDURE-- the looking at a spot on the Arc of Approach version, not the often subconscious help the longer levers switch ends version, or any other version . Dang theres others too! ) as an Alignment : thats an interesting question , comment. If each of our own individual Aiming Points are somewhat unique and found through trial and error then perhaps its not an alignment. More like a trick to override the physics , the COAM or is it the MOI or the CiA? FBI? I'll leave physics to those that can understand it better than I do which is just about zero.

So you got the geometry (of the circular clubhead orbit etc ) , you got the physics and you have the necessary mechanical alignments (which all relate to impact alignments). The right forearm flying wedge is for sure a mechanical , structural Alignment of the first order. Up there with the Primary Lever. Get those two working and your on your way.

In terms of the geometry ..... Homer's was not the geometry of theorems , more the geometry that could have been drawn. I'd like to see an effort to draw as much of it as we can. Draw the circles , or a portion there of (arcs), tangents, cords, angles . As seen from different perspectives . The very same entity can have a different name when seen from a different perspective. Unless you can see it IMO in drawing form , communication via words is challenged.

Perhaps some of the physics could have an associated drawing , of a model or something. Words only go so far there for me too.

Because we should think alignments not positions (HK said that) I like thos "reflective tape" sequenced photos. Hogan's coul be very informative. The "SUPER SLOW MOTION" like those of tiger are also valuable.

Am I pulling this thread away from the circle- sorry.

HB