Originally Posted by Mike O
|
|
The fact that people mis-understand a Golfing Machine concept is nothing new - you can see it every day. Does any concept need real conversation for those that don't understand it - absolutely. I think his quote in the first post of this thread is quite clear. I guess you'd either need to ask a question, make a statement, or argue a point to begin the conversation. However, we'd need to clarify - is the conversation about the Golfing Machine concept as understood in the Golfing Machine book or are you wanting a conversation with new information or perspective, otherwise it would become quite confusing for some.
|
Let it start with The Book, should it stray call it up short then.
Statement- I (likely many) have spent time trying to train my hands to make a motion that obeys "good" alignments rules, even, when this training caused me to miss hit.
Question- What is the "aiming point concept" trying to "adjust" in my alignments? ie. is it impact hand location for the various clubs?, release hand location for the various clubs and release types? I am trying to understand the "what and why" and fit it in.
Statement - Experimenting with "points" on the plane line has not been a helpful concept for me.
--------------later----------------------------------------------------------
Ah-ha moment. Reading 7-23 par. #3, HK may have insight in recognizing line delivery and compensations when necessary.
Understand it I may experiment. My procedure had been, If U care, to have a "feel" fo release position backing up from impact fix, a practice memory over the range of clubs.
HB