[MizunoJoe]

He is 12 yards behind the PGA Tour Average in driving distance 277 vs. 289 T12 in % of drives that go 240 to 260 but to his credit t15 in ak-er-it . . . 5 from the bottom in ball speed 4 from the bottom in carry distance 106 clubhead speed . . . I know that he would stomp a mudhole in me as far as ball striking goes . . . BUT . . . I'm not convinced that this is the most "efficient" "powerful" swing model. Looks like he is moving back and hanging back to me . . . great player . . . but just sayin' . . .

Way more dynamic ways to move the club . . . Verplank's club never encounters the pulley wheel . . . One club is getting drug and one club is getting THROWN . . . One pivot is live . . . one pivot is hanging back . . . One has hips going forward one had head tilting backward . . . Not saying that Verplank ain't an awesome player . . . just not sure his swing is the model . . Pictures tell a story here . . . can see why Doyle would like it though.

Scott is a lifelong diabetic and can't generate a lot of horsepower. He's not a healthy man and tires easily. Maybe the snap release pattern is the most efficient and is why he could earn over $1.75 million last yr and over $800K so far this yr? Maybe that's why Ben teaches it?