[footwedge]

Footwedge and Changemyswing - Y'all are welcome here and we've been down this path so many times it's not worth getting spun up about.

This site and Lynn's teaching continue to decode Kelley's work. Without a complete understanding of Kelleys TGM, it is difficult if not impossible to apply current science to the facts. You have to have a complete understanding first and then go test it. Other teachers have facts and are applying science to them. That's great! But if they don't have their facts straight then the science is only verifying misinformation.

I'm not pointing fingers at anyone in particular, in fact the majority of golf science is likely rooted in bad assumptions to begin with.

There is a place for both.
Good fundamental facts and current science to illuminate it further.

Science doesn't verify misinformation it disqualifies it. You have an idea or a theory than you put it to a series of tests to prove it or disprove it, with no predujice towards the results, some things can be right and some can be wrong or all can be right or all can be wrong. Homer's work falls in the first of those.