I wanna talk to him more about Trackman. Ive been watching some Sean Foley stuff and he's got me all worked up about it. The news letters are interesting too if you've checked them out.
I wanna talk to him more about Trackman. Ive been watching some Sean Foley stuff and he's got me all worked up about it. The news letters are interesting too if you've checked them out.
PGA Teaching Pro out of Rochester. Goggle John Graham Golf.
Can't link you yet John. Maybe sometime in the future.
__________________
Bagger
1-H "Because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available - but separately, and probably endlessly." Homer Kelly
Ah I got a question about this 85% thing of trackmans...........85% which way? Up and down or left and right? Im thinking its up and down or just down, maybe Im wrong. Homers "practically" at right angles was left and right of course. As if to say for "practical purposes" you can just point the club at the hole and forget about it.
I dunno. Where's John?
"More and more this seems to be about less and less. "
I gotta bump this up I really want to know if this could possibly be true.
Just wanted to tell everyone thank you for being such hospitable hosts.
Especially, Thank You to Lynn for tolerating my annoying alter ego and for pointing out my rudeness on one occasion.
Also, Thank You to 12 piece for the phone call and questions. Hope it was helpful.
Certainly, this experience has opened my eyes for interpretation of the little yellow book (wishing I had 6th edition, but oh well) and a better understanding of terminology.
JG
Sign-Off #2
Originally Posted by John Graham
Sorry for the interruption.
Please continue with your forum.
Good Luck and Best Wishes to all.
Thank you, John, for your dripping condescension. We nailed your IP and identity from your earliest posts and knew exactly what was going on. Hope your agenda was served.
Ours was.
Interesting that the 'heat in the kitchen' was enough to make you 'come clean' and skedaddle while you still had a tail to put between your legs. Not as much fun when the punching bag punches back, is it?
...like the affluent oppressors of the masses in Bollingbrook. I have rats and large mice, but thanks for bringing it up, OK?
.
On the other hand, you have been grumbling for a couple of days. Those guys from wherever don't know anything. We could just make a rule to post materials without slamming anyone by name. Treat all new "observations" as ideas to be proven over time. Whenever some person castigates by name, we just delete the name or post.
OB, your remark about Favre was funny. All sports radio is covering now are his failed attempts to seduce a younger woman recorded on tape. He is a sad guy.
Moi
So long NC.
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
I will shorten it and make my peeps here, happier.
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
(this is the calm 'daryl', it's not my normal personality)
Dear Sheriff Bagger Lance,
It's become apparent that LGB.com, along with its Pro Contributors, Members and Homer Kelley's research has become a testing ground for new Golf Theories. By applying our knowledge of Alignments and Forces to new theory, we serve as an examination Gauntlet that otherwise wouldn't exist.*
When dealing with future encounters, my perspective will be to treat them as such. By sifting new theories through an Alignment and Forces examination, much may not get through. But something may, and that information can add to our own knowledge.
It may seem that sometimes visitors engage us with a challenge. But maybe it's not them wanting confrontation, but them wanting a theory confronted by people who have the knowledge and commitment to do so.
* (With all due respect to Chuck Evans, and Paul Smith (Golf Guru), who runs Iseekgolf.com with an exceptional group of members too.
Huge mistake in my judgement. I apologize to all for standing up for him. I am seeing posts on other forums that tell me I was dead wrong in my assessment of the situation. I won't be so trusting in the future. Sorry friends.
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
It's great that we are a litmus test, but that's not our primary mission and TGM is not Lynn's only text. If there is new knowledge to add or corrections to make to Homer's 30 year old work, great! Happy to help if we can, but we aren't the "keepers of the sacred scrolls".
Joe Daniels is. Take it up with him. We can only advise and consult if asked.
Other sites want to play tribal warfare and that's fine. They have been off our radar for a long time.
That is until one of their supporters shows up with an agenda to discredit LBG. Why here and not at Joe Daniels shop? Good question. Maybe it is a litmus test. But in most cases it is cloaked with an agenda.
So without knowing who we are dealing with, we have to tread with caution. Unfortunately.
We are simply interested in helping people play better golf on their home course and on TOUR.
__________________
Bagger
1-H "Because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available - but separately, and probably endlessly." Homer Kelly