Angle of Approach Procedure Question - Page 2 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Angle of Approach Procedure Question

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-30-2007, 09:20 AM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
Originally Posted by YodasLuke View Post
You're certainly on the right track. I've spent many hours studying this very subject.

I had problems reconciling the logical arguments and statements about this subject. My major concerns were with the seeming contradictions with 1-L. So, I knew I was treading in unchartered territory.

The Angle of Approach Procedure is a 10-5-E, closed Plane Line. This Plane Line is a line that is VISUALLY covered by the clubhead blur. The reason that the clubhead can VISUALLY cover and still move in a circle, per 1-L #9 is: the steepness of the plane.

When you're riding a bike and you look down at the tire, you see the straight line that the tire covers (wheel track). When you're watching someone ride beside you, you're seeing the side of the wheel (wheel rim). It's all about VISUAL perspective.

When Impact and Low Point are kept as two constant points on a 10-5-A Plane, a second Plane could pass through the same two points and be much more vertical. As the steepness of the new Plane approaches the steepness of the eyes (compared to the Turned Shoulder Plane with the eyes above it), it appears to be a straight line blur of the clubhead.

It's something that can be shown in a couple of minutes with two circles. But, it's a little hard to put into words.
Great post! Ted . . . After incubating the theoretical side of the Angle of Approach . . . do you think in EXECUTION of the procedure . . . "JUST GO OUT TO RIGHT FIELD" is the thing to do? And experiement with HOW MUCH OUT works best for the player? Or does the procedure in fact require a great deal of precision with regards to the actual Angle of Approach line?
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-30-2007, 02:17 PM
sustainthelag sustainthelag is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by YodasLuke View Post
You're certainly on the right track. I've spent many hours studying this very subject.

I had problems reconciling the logical arguments and statements about this subject. My major concerns were with the seeming contradictions with 1-L. So, I knew I was treading in unchartered territory.

The Angle of Approach Procedure is a 10-5-E, closed Plane Line. This Plane Line is a line that is VISUALLY covered by the clubhead blur. The reason that the clubhead can VISUALLY cover and still move in a circle, per 1-L #9 is: the steepness of the plane.

When you're riding a bike and you look down at the tire, you see the straight line that the tire covers (wheel track). When you're watching someone ride beside you, you're seeing the side of the wheel (wheel rim). It's all about VISUAL perspective.

When Impact and Low Point are kept as two constant points on a 10-5-A Plane, a second Plane could pass through the same two points and be much more vertical. As the steepness of the new Plane approaches the steepness of the eyes (compared to the Turned Shoulder Plane with the eyes above it), it appears to be a straight line blur of the clubhead.

It's something that can be shown in a couple of minutes with two circles. But, it's a little hard to put into words.
Ted, thank you very much for your post. It really helped clear things up. Looking forward to seeing a video on this to make it concrete for me.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-19-2008, 08:22 PM
3Putt 3Putt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 44
Originally Posted by mb6606 View Post
The club head does not cover the plane line but covers the alternate target line (roughly 11 degrees out toward right field).
Interesting seeing this reference to 11 degrees. I had just seen the same 11 deg reference in the latest issue of Score Golf magazine when illustrating what resembles an angle of approach procedure. http://scoregolf.com/articles/x-feat...uccess.cfm?p=2

Article has some similarities to TGM - not sure if accidental or on purpose.

3Putt
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-19-2008, 08:47 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Where Else In the World?
Thanks, Mike O (brilliant post) and YodasLuke (why settle for video when you can get The Man himself at 770-401-1086).

I love this place!

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-19-2008, 08:54 PM
Augusta Golf's Avatar
Augusta Golf Augusta Golf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Jones Creek Golf Club-Augusta, GA
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by YodasLuke View Post
You're certainly on the right track. I've spent many hours studying this very subject.

I had problems reconciling the logical arguments and statements about this subject. My major concerns were with the seeming contradictions with 1-L. So, I knew I was treading in unchartered territory.

The Angle of Approach Procedure is a 10-5-E, closed Plane Line. This Plane Line is a line that is VISUALLY covered by the clubhead blur. The reason that the clubhead can VISUALLY cover and still move in a circle, per 1-L #9 is: the steepness of the plane.

When you're riding a bike and you look down at the tire, you see the straight line that the tire covers (wheel track). When you're watching someone ride beside you, you're seeing the side of the wheel (wheel rim). It's all about VISUAL perspective.

When Impact and Low Point are kept as two constant points on a 10-5-A Plane, a second Plane could pass through the same two points and be much more vertical. As the steepness of the new Plane approaches the steepness of the eyes (compared to the Turned Shoulder Plane with the eyes above it), it appears to be a straight line blur of the clubhead.

It's something that can be shown in a couple of minutes with two circles. But, it's a little hard to put into words.
Name:  jedi.jpg
Views: 44
Size:  5.6 KB These guys are good.
__________________
Hitting the Ball is the easiest part of the game-hitting it effectively is the most difficult. Why trust instinct when there is a science."1-G.


B. J. Hathaway, G.S.E.B., M.C.I.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.