LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - Eldrick Picture..good?bad? depends? Thread: Eldrick Picture..good?bad? depends? View Single Post #252 02-07-2012, 12:07 PM HungryBear Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 759 Home again Returning to the Original question of this thread. Recognizing the insight from O.B., Daryl and bucket from post reply #242 to present. Looks like a good uncompensated swing. Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket What do y'all think about this picture? Description? Opinions? Workable? Model? Complicated? Following the rules: Flat left wrist that only cocks and uncocks, never bends or rolls. AND A bend right wrist that never cocks or rolls. From FIX to FOLLOW THROUGH. NOTE- all roll is assembly roll of the wedge assembly. an uncompensated stroke REQUIRES: swinging- horizontal hinge, requireing- a pitch right elbow and a slap onplane forearm JUST like Tiger picture. Likewise hitting will require punch right elbow and a fanning right forearm. Failing these elements, compensations are required. Note that he ap-pears to have "perfect" 90 degree wedges and #3 pp is on plane but "high aft" on the shaft- ie. still rotating to the aft side which it will not reach until impact. Horizontal hinging, sequenced release Now, assume assume he had arrived at the position of shaft level to the ground and parallel to the pl. With a punch elbow. pp#3 would be behind the shaft, on plane and the face perpendicular to the plane for ANGLED hinging. Now- switching a drag start down to a punch release fit well. Just get to the punch elbow. I know - HK wants CHOICES of components. But, would it not help many to say that uncompensated stroke requires a limited selection process? HB HungryBear View Public Profile Send a private message to HungryBear Find all posts by HungryBear