LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Golfing Machine - Basic (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Brian Gay Leg Straightening and Newton's Third Law (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6531)

galanga 04-23-2009 10:21 PM

Brian Gay Leg Straightening and Newton's Third Law
 
I posted in the Tour forum: "Why does Brian straighten his legs through impact? I do find this useful in my own swing, but, don't really understand what it is doing for him or me."

Yoda asked me to put this in another thread with the tantalizing statement that the answer is: "Equal and opposite' reaction and its resulting athletic sense."

I am very interested in knowing more about what this means. Such as, what is the force(s)/action(s) it is a reaction to? What does it indicate he has accomplished? What are the feels?

Thank you for any insights that may lift the fog.

O.B.Left 04-24-2009 12:33 AM

Here's a couple of other guys for consideration.



http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=124054750 2

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=124054750 2

powerdraw 04-24-2009 07:32 AM

seems to happen real early in brians swing

12 piece bucket 04-24-2009 08:15 AM

Lots of dudes will straighten their legs AND disrupted the motion of their Right Shoulder. The right shoulder location is HUGE in staying on Plane and being able to trace the Plane Line (or selected Visual Equivalent to the original Plane Line). You can see lots of people who do this early AND goat hump it (hips go toward the plane line and spine gets vertical). . . . this disrupts everything and shoots the arms out to the right and lays the shaft down under plane.

If you'll watch Brian you'll note how well he "keeps his angles" as far as his spine and shoulders go. This is a huge piece of controlling the Angle of Approach (Path) . . . Combine that with excellent controll of the face . . . . You post stats like he did . . . .

Marinate on this a lil' bit . . .

2-H SHOULDER MOTIONS The point may be made that it is impossible to inscribe perfect circles while the center is in motion – that is the turning Shoulder. The straight line requirements of the Compression Point are satisfied as long as both the Vertical and Horizontal Centers move precisely in unison. Direction control remains stable because both Centers are also moving in a circle – that is, the circumference of the Shoulder Turn.

The spine, between the shoulders, is the center of the Shoulder Turn only, not of the Left Arm, except by specific extension of the Swing Radius. Because, Swinging from the Wrists, the Left Shoulder, the Right Elbow, the Waist or the Feet, show it to have just to many exceptions. Though the “Head” Pivot Center is recommended, it is not at all mandatory.

But the Shoulders do have crucial On Plane functions – synchronizing and aligning the Pivot Mtion and Thrust with those of the Power Package (Chapter 6). “On Plane” Right Shoulder Motion is possible only by titling its axis – the spine. See 7-14. In this area the Left Shoulder is helpless. The geometry of Shoulder Control deals only with Right Shoulder, for there are no guide lines for Left Shoulder control of the Right Shoulder. Therefore, variations in Right Shoulder location will vary the Left Shoulder location at Impact and, consequently, the Low Point location as well as the Angle of Approach (2-N).

Being a part of the Pivot and the Power Package, the Right Shoulder must reconcile them by moving with the greatest precision for thrust, speed, direction and distance. (7-3) So the Right Shoulder does not flap around haphazardly – it has many responsibilities. And variations in its Impact location will vary the Right Elbow’s Impact Bend and so may alter the Impact alignment of the Clubface. See 6-E and 7-23. The long Backstroke Shoulder Turn produces CIRCLE Path (10-23-E) and ARC of Approach procedures. The short Shoulder Turn produces “LINE” types of Delivery Path (10-23) and “ANGLE” of Approach procedures (2-J-3). So – if the Shoulder Turn is too great and takes the Hands inside the proper Angle of Approach (2-J-3), then you must shift to an Arc of Approach Delivery Line to “clear the Right Hip” (2-J-3). Or get an unwanted Pull. OR A SHANK. Otherwise, the Three Dimensions will become un-correlated including Compression Leakage (2-C-0) and an obvious struggle. As it goes back, so it tends to come down – because of the differences in Loading Characteristics (Components 11, 19, and 22).


Daryl 04-24-2009 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galanga (Post 62817)
I posted in the Tour forum: "Why does Brian straighten his legs through impact? I do find this useful in my own swing, but, don't really understand what it is doing for him or me."

Yoda asked me to put this in another thread with the tantalizing statement that the answer is: "Equal and opposite' reaction and its resulting athletic sense."

I am very interested in knowing more about what this means. Such as, what is the force(s)/action(s) it is a reaction to? What does it indicate he has accomplished? What are the feels?

Thank you for any insights that may lift the fog.

Maybe like a "Hammer Thrower" in Olympic Sport. Create more centrifugal force? I don't know. But tell him not to stop doing it. :)

O.B.Left 04-24-2009 09:33 AM

dont go changing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 62826)
Maybe like a "Hammer Thrower" in Olympic Sport. Create more centrifugal force? I don't know. But tell him not to stop doing it. :)



Yah dont stop, Brian. Straighten those things and wear green pants on Sunday at Augusta, they'll work nicely with a green jacket.

golfbulldog 04-24-2009 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 62825)

Marinate on this a lil' bit . . .

2-H SHOULDER MOTIONS The point may be made that it is impossible to inscribe perfect circles while the center is in motion – that is the turning Shoulder. The straight line requirements of the Compression Point are satisfied as long as both the Vertical and Horizontal Centers move precisely in unison. Direction control remains stable because both Centers are also moving in a circle – that is, the circumference of the Shoulder Turn.

The spine, between the shoulders, is the center of the Shoulder Turn only, not of the Left Arm, except by specific extension of the Swing Radius. Because, Swinging from the Wrists, the Left Shoulder, the Right Elbow, the Waist or the Feet, show it to have just to many exceptions. Though the “Head” Pivot Center is recommended, it is not at all mandatory.

But the Shoulders do have crucial On Plane functions – synchronizing and aligning the Pivot Mtion and Thrust with those of the Power Package (Chapter 6). “On Plane” Right Shoulder Motion is possible only by titling its axis – the spine. See 7-14. In this area the Left Shoulder is helpless. The geometry of Shoulder Control deals only with Right Shoulder, for there are no guide lines for Left Shoulder control of the Right Shoulder. Therefore, variations in Right Shoulder location will vary the Left Shoulder location at Impact and, consequently, the Low Point location as well as the Angle of Approach (2-N).

Being a part of the Pivot and the Power Package, the Right Shoulder must reconcile them by moving with the greatest precision for thrust, speed, direction and distance. (7-3) So the Right Shoulder does not flap around haphazardly – it has many responsibilities. And variations in its Impact location will vary the Right Elbow’s Impact Bend and so may alter the Impact alignment of the Clubface. See 6-E and 7-23. The long Backstroke Shoulder Turn produces CIRCLE Path (10-23-E) and ARC of Approach procedures. The short Shoulder Turn produces “LINE” types of Delivery Path (10-23) and “ANGLE” of Approach procedures (2-J-3). So – if the Shoulder Turn is too great and takes the Hands inside the proper Angle of Approach (2-J-3), then you must shift to an Arc of Approach Delivery Line to “clear the Right Hip” (2-J-3). Or get an unwanted Pull. OR A SHANK. Otherwise, the Three Dimensions will become un-correlated including Compression Leakage (2-C-0) and an obvious struggle. As it goes back, so it tends to come down – because of the differences in Loading Characteristics (Components 11, 19, and 22).


Still stewin in your juices 12PB...agree with the bits I understand so far - but what do you reckon to the green stuff I added above...do many angle of approachers really shorten their shoulder turn...or do they use top arc bit....something like that post Yoda did on KJ CHoi about a year ago??

12 piece bucket 04-24-2009 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfbulldog (Post 62839)
Still stewin in your juices 12PB...agree with the bits I understand so far - but what do you reckon to the green stuff I added above...do many angle of approachers really shorten their shoulder turn...or do they use top arc bit....something like that post Yoda did on KJ CHoi about a year ago??


I'd say watch somebody like a Snead or Bobby Jones . . . Some of this has to do with Plane Angle as well and the depth of the hands/whether there is a bunch of lifting going on e.g. Furyk . . . . in addition to all that the rate that #4 must release to stay on the selected plane too . . . . and there are probably some assumptions with regards to the "inscribing perfect circles" as mentioned in the first part of 2-H.

Pretty sophistocated subject . . . . probably beyond my level of sophistocation.

drewitgolf 04-24-2009 05:07 PM

"O" no you didn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 62842)
Pretty sophistocated subject . . . . probably beyond my level of sophistocation.

Mike O called me and asked if I would post a reply to your above quote (seeing he is retired and all). But I told him that this is a G Rated Forum and we couldn't go there anymore :eyes: .

12 piece bucket 04-24-2009 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drewitgolf (Post 62846)
Mike O called me and asked if I would post a reply to your above quote (seeing he is retired and all). But I told him that this is a G Rated Forum and we couldn't go there anymore :eyes: .

Yeah . . . . figures that Mikey would get excited about a thread referencing "Gay Leg Straightening" . . . . he's like shotokan 7th degree blackbelt ninja master on that subject.

When there's a full moon up that way holler at Mike for me . . .

Daryl 04-26-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galanga (Post 62817)
I posted in the Tour forum: "Why does Brian straighten his legs through impact? I do find this useful in my own swing, but, don't really understand what it is doing for him or me."

Yoda asked me to put this in another thread with the tantalizing statement that the answer is: "Equal and opposite' reaction and its resulting athletic sense."

I am very interested in knowing more about what this means. Such as, what is the force(s)/action(s) it is a reaction to? What does it indicate he has accomplished? What are the feels?

Thank you for any insights that may lift the fog.


I'm shocked. :boxing: While browsing the Forums, it was said that BG was a Hitter and that Straightening His Legs has something to do with Hitting. If I wasn't so surprised :o I could remember where it came from. I read it just this morning. :BangHead:

KevCarter 04-26-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 62939)
I'm shocked. :boxing: While browsing the Forums, it was said that BG was a Hitter and that Straightening His Legs has something to do with Hitting. If I wasn't so surprised :o I could remember where it came from. I read it just this morning. :BangHead:

I thought from Yoda's video that Brian was a swinger. I have been corrected by many on other forums saying he is a hitter. Should I stick to my guns? Which is he?

Kevin

Daryl 04-26-2009 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevCarter (Post 62942)
I thought from Yoda's video that Brian was a swinger. I have been corrected by many on other forums saying he is a hitter. Should I stick to my guns? Which is he?

Kevin

I read Hitter. Maybe 4 Barrel? Right Arm Thrust. I feel like a NewBe.:confused1

O.B.Left 04-26-2009 07:34 PM

I think its still unresolved to some degree. There is a Yoda post somewhere on this. If I recall correctly something along the lines of:

-Yoda says he's thrusting, for the most part. "Near as he can figure"
-stops at Top with the pressure point staying on the aft of the shaft.
-starts from adjusted though, lagging takeaway.
-angled hinging
-push fade tendency like most hitters
-his buddy John Reggier thinks he's swinging.

In B.G's first video with Yoda he looks to be really turning his pivot actively through the ball. In later videos he seems to have toned it down a touch. Short, slow and heavy. At least to my eye.

Hey different strokes for different folks. I think Larry Nelson has been described as a hitter, from adjusted, that goes to end (across the line at top but along the angle of approach) etc.

Im thinking there should be a "who am I" game around here. Yoda lets us in on one component every day until somebody names the pro. The winner getting free access to the free video vault in perpetuity. Only TGM could support this sort of thing.

Daryl 04-26-2009 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 62954)

Im thinking there should be a "who am I" game around here. Yoda lets us in on one component every day until somebody names the pro. The winner getting free access to the free video vault in perpetuity. Only TGM could support this sort of thing.

Great Idea for the Golf Channel when Yoda gets his 1/2 hour weekly. He can explain and demonstrate the component, and at the end of the season the Golfer is Identified. Then, one those that forwarded their responses can be drawn from a hat to win something.

O.B. at least two of us will watch every week. :)

BurleyGolf 04-26-2009 08:35 PM

I think Brian is trying to hold back the right hip as long as possible and you guys are looking at something that might distroy your own swing. This is for Brian and might or probley want work for most!

Daryl 04-27-2009 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BurleyGolf (Post 62957)
I think Brian is trying to hold back the right hip as long as possible and you guys are looking at something that might distroy your own swing. This is for Brian and might or probley want work for most!

If he's a Hitter, then his pivot is a Backstop for his Right Forearm fanning slap-punch. More Pivot Overlap = greater Mass, Less separation, you know the drill. :golf:

We should be able to identify the components and variations he uses. :salut:

Daryl 04-27-2009 08:06 AM

Alignment Golf
 
Swing or Hit? Do both?
Alignment Golf. :salut:
Paraphrasing Homer: 'the ball only goes where it's told'.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 60965)
Brian feels he uses his Right Arm a lot during the Impact Interval. That would explain why setting his Right Forearm On Plane at Address these past three years has made such a tremendous difference for him. Also, his abbreviated Backstroke is indicative of Drive Loading, and despite his extremely fast Downstroke Shoulder Turn, his Hip and Shoulder 'separation' is minimal. Finally, all his Short Shot and 'through Impact' posed alignments tend toward Angled Hinging (with its 'bad shot' being a 'Push Cut).

So, the jury is out, but as near as I can figure, he's Hitting, and these are the alignments we've emphasized. On the other hand, Brian's good TOUR friend, John Riegger, thinks he's Swinging.

Most of us need to take a page from Jeff Hull's book and not worry so much about it. Pay attention to the Impact alignments -- per 1-L #20, the Geometry is identical for every Machine -- and let your natural instincts dictate the Physics of the Action.

:salut:


KevCarter 04-27-2009 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 62979)
Swing or Hit? Do both?
Alignment Golf. :salut:
Paraphrasing Homer: 'the ball only goes where it's told'.

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoda
Most of us need to take a page from Jeff Hull's book and not worry so much about it. Pay attention to the Impact alignments -- per 1-L #20, the Geometry is identical for every Machine -- and let your natural instincts dictate the Physics of the Action.

Great quote. We get too hung up on things that don't really matter in the big scheme!

Kevin

Daryl 04-27-2009 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevCarter (Post 62980)
Great quote. We get too hung up on things that don't really matter in the big scheme!

Kevin

Except that Hitters have fallen to the Darkside.

KevCarter 04-27-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 62996)
Except that Hitters have fallen to the Darkside.

What? But Ted told me swinging was the dark side. I'm so confused...:laughing9

Kevin

Daryl 04-27-2009 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevCarter (Post 62997)
What? But Ted told me swinging was the dark side. I'm so confused...:laughing9

Kevin

Ya, and he's a hitter. You can't trust them.

Daryl 04-28-2009 12:09 PM

Who said: “if you teach one to mimic how the pro’s swing that he’ll be a better Golfer”, or something along that thought? That’s simply hogwash. :BangHead:

I was thinking about how/why Brian’s Pivot has less motion today than two years ago. I conclude first, it’s because that’s all he needs, and second that less motion does not mean less effective. (and also because of the greatest G.O.L.F. instruction on the planet)

After a lifetime of practice and play, his Pivot can do more work in 1” than mine can do in 6”. Precision and training. If you consider that a professional Boxer can hit harder with a 6” punch than I can with a baseball bat, you can more readily comprehend the value of practice and play over a lifetime.

Precision takes out the wobble and will reduce the total motion needed for the shot. It’s more important than power because precision is valuable for every shot in golf. But simply reducing motion will not create the precision that’s earned from a lifetime of dedication.

So, the next time BG plays and you hear the announcers say to emulate Brian’s Pivot, reply, “in your dreams”. :naughty:

O.B.Left 04-28-2009 04:06 PM

Nice one Daryl

You dont need much but you do need some pivot.

For all but the non pivot strokes, there must be pivot lag swinging or hitting. I think a lot of guys trying out hitting for the first time have some residual swinging components like a fast turn in start down etc but then dial it down a little which is great, then dial it down a lot which is also good if they dont run out of right arm and then they turn it right off......which is a running out of right arm, throwaway disaster in the making.

There is still a pivot when hitting (though it might feel otherwise when coming from swinging). It leads in transition, bottom up, loading the lag pressure point (on the aft of the shaft, if you stop at top) taking up the slack in the left arm, loading the right elbow (as opposed to the swingers left hand wrist cock deal, pretty though it is. I still look at the photos)

But all of this is a lot of thinking for the Primal hitter brain who is normally just "me compress ball straight", "me find ball and compress straight again", "me need go bathroom" etc . There is a hitter's high I believe associated with the pressure points and compression, a dopamine release. Golf should be pleasurable after all.

Me go hit balls now.

OB

12 piece bucket 04-28-2009 10:53 PM

Here's the move . . . . BG is SLAP ON PLANE THROUGH THE WHOLE MOTION . . . . There's not a whole lot that can go wrong here. I know there have been some comments about the leg motion . . . it's different but whatever who cares . . . look at how well the club moves it doesn't waver AT ALL from the plane. I mean some dudes could say yeah it's shifting from the elbow to the tsp. BUT THESE SHIFTS ARE MINIMAL. Stop his hands 1/2 way back 1/2 way down and look at the space they are in at address vs. impact. There's not much movement AT ALL.

Also check how well he " stays in his spine angle " or "torso inclination" or whatever the heck you wanna call it. No bobbing at all. The face is nice a quiet thru the ball. This is ONE SIMPLE EFFICIENT MOTION.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jycQYQcspE

Daryl 04-29-2009 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 63066)
Here's the move . . . . BG is SLAP ON PLANE THROUGH THE WHOLE MOTION . . . . There's not a whole lot that can go wrong here. I know there have been some comments about the leg motion . . . it's different but whatever who cares . . . look at how well the club moves it doesn't waver AT ALL from the plane. I mean some dudes could say yeah it's shifting from the elbow to the tsp. BUT THESE SHIFTS ARE MINIMAL. Stop his hands 1/2 way back 1/2 way down and look at the space they are in at address vs. impact. There's not much movement AT ALL.

Also check how well he " stays in his spine angle " or "torso inclination" or whatever the heck you wanna call it. No bobbing at all. The face is nice a quiet thru the ball. This is ONE SIMPLE EFFICIENT MOTION.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jycQYQcspE

Don’t you find his Leg Motion interesting?

Zone 2&3 can be no better than Zone 1. BG has quiet leg and hip motion yet he creates great hip action.

Is it Style or a result of Precision? I say precision. Yet, teachers have been pushing for quiet leg motion for years now. Aren’t they confusing cause with effect?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.