Having been to Bioengine and trained using his methods I can attest to there being much validity in the process. As far as value goes it's been worth every cent, especially compared to the usual Golf Digest tips you get from many golf pro's! Bio has a very methodical training approach that stems from a very accurate measuring system. You'll never know if you never go!

ya, but does he give "coupons" if I refer someone to him?

Coupons? Am guessing that's a humor attempt? But no, he doesn't. It's not some chain mail religious weird cult vibe, no political or financial gain as you climb a ladder, just a guy running a business with a very worthwhile product. I will however gladly recommend people to go despite the fact I have nothing to gain, except watching my mates play better golf.:)

Yes, it's my poor sense of humor. It's just that you have such a good sales pitch. This last response is an even better Sales Pitch. :laughing9

Hey, in America, "Mate" means "sexual partner or marriage partner".

Ha, re;mate, I better be careful of my lingo here then, though maybe I'm that attractive I have plural mates!
Sales pitch? Well I understand it comes across like that, I'm just into it and think it's worth at least listening to what he has to say. It's hard to be positive without it sounding like a sales pitch I guess.

It's great to be positive. It sounds like you're learning a lot and having fun. I wish the best for you.

No Mind,
We aren't talking about COAM Conservation of Angular Momentum.
We are talking about conservation of momentum.

Ok forumula M1*V1=-M2*V2
example
The above equation is one statement of the law of momentum conservation. In a collision, the momentum change of object 1 is equal to and opposite of the momentum change of object 2. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2. In most collisions between two objects, one object slows down and loses momentum while the other object speeds up and gains momentum. If object 1 loses 75 units of momentum, then object 2 gains 75 units of momentum. Yet, the total momentum of the two objects (object 1 plus object 2) is the same before the collision as it is after the collision. The total momentum of the system (the collection of two objects) is conserved.
6-M-1 with conseravtion of momentum applies and what drive it musclular loading.

Daryl,
I don't give out cupons, instead we give out free chocolate bars :laughing9 .

Not here to seek business, I'm only here to share knowledge on a game we are all pasionate about.:golf:

That's one of my weaknesses. :laughing9

I appreciate you efforts. It's very interesting and helpful. I see more and more of BioMechanics on the Web. You're much better than others I've read and I'm finding merit to much of what you say.

Daryl,
The problem with biomechanics is anyone can by a biomechanics software and start researching. Although there are two factors to consider is the quality of the software they use. You can't compare a 38,000 dollar system to a 250,000 dollars system the cheaper version isn't anywhere as accurate.
It's like polhemus systems is no where near as accurate as a Vicon system.

Also you should question the researchers background and what it is they researching in the golf swing and how they are researching.
There are a few companies who have no qualifications in biomechanics or human movement patterns also using cheap systems.

They work of buzz words and basic knowledge, also they add points of view and opinion and measure science, they don't to stick to the laws of motion and physics.
This makes it very difficult to educate consumers with the truth have these guys out there muddying the water and confusing people.

I hope one day in the PGA there are two type of coaches geometry and physics coaches, each understands the others field so they inter grade and work together for the better of the game.

Bio . . . still trying to get my mind around this . . . what components are intrumental in achieving "better" physics? Is it all pivot? Where do the arms and the "accumulators" come in? Do you teach how the arms and wrists are to work as well? Or do they just respond to the pivot? Also certainly not implying this about you but . . . . how many self-described experts in biomechanics understand the ball flight laws? If they didn't . .. .would it make any difference in what they taught you?