But weren't y'all the cats that said that the snap release equated to distance? My contention that what Ben and Verplank are doing is NOT SNAP . . . as far as the diabetic deal . . . I know about that . . . but my counter point would be Hogan basically couldn't walk and his swing looks way more dynamic than Ben and Verplank rolled up together . . . They are not releasing the club at least that would be my observation of the pictures . . . both of them get really pitchy and tilt back behind it and their pivots stall? That's what I see . . . but I don't have $1.75 million. I'm not saying that you'd teach Verplank out of it . . . that'd be kinda like teaching Jamaal Wilks not to do that whacky thing with his jump shot. But by tour standards Verplank is a tapper. But of course he is rich. So if you wanna say this Doyle version of the "snap" release is a get rich swing fine . . . but I don't think it's the model for hittin' the long ball. Don't look like Verplank or Ben are bringing the full radius to bear on the ball to me.

In my dookey ball rat poisoned mind the full radius is brought to bear by fully extending the primary lever and extending all the pivot components from the ground up FORWARD not backwards . . . knees, hips, spine, chest accumulators . . .

I can agree with this . . . Garcia and from what I know of that Schaeffer dude's swing are certainly SLINGING the golf club . . . I contend that Ben and Verplank are not.

Was it mentioned on the link that the snap was the route to distance? A better statement would be a high percentage of snappers are long hitters. Also, is Ben's swing really a get rich swing? :)

It looks like Verplank has some unused horsepower below his belly button. I still like his hinge action through the ball though.

Interesting you mention this...go to http://www.smh.com.au/executive-styl...803-1iai6.html

A study published by the Journal of Applied Biomechanics on the hips in generating power.

WOW MizunoJoe!

One of my favorite players, I had no idea how much he moved back, but as you mentioned, beautiful alignments at impact. Just goes to show there are many ways to effectively swing the club...

I wonder why some great teachers of TGM include the Essentials as part of their teaching bible, while others treat them much like the optional components??? We all seem to agree on the Imperatives.

On a side note, I was fortunate to attend a little clinic with Bobby Clampett the other night. I was very impressed with both he and his ball striking. I would say his move is somewhere between stationary head and Mr, Verplank. He talked quite a bit about Mr. Doyle and his influence. Great stuff!

It really does come down to impact alignments...

:salut: :salut: :salut:

Kevin

Kev . . . if you was gonna push a refrigerator . . . would you move your head back away from it while you were pushing it?

LOL. I teach and use LBG exclusively. Stationary Pivot, MacDonald Exercises, RFT, Aiming Point, Imperatives and Essentials. YODA's swing is my model. Preaching to the choir. :salut:

However, I'm smart enough to know Mr. Doyle can teach circles around me, and Verplank could give me 4 a side and throttle me. :) Lot's of ways to play if you believe in it.

I believe in the stationary pivot. I have proven it to be the most effective for my swing, and it is how I help my students improve the fastest. I'm comfortable enough in my techniques, all learned here, that I can focus on the positives without having to dismiss what others do. Live and let live!

Kevin

I'm with you HOWEVER . . . I'll say this . . . people have assumed that the snap release is somehow "superior" . . . and that it goes farther . . . I ain't buying it. At least not this version of it . . . Plus lots of people equate everything that Doyle teaches as THE representation of the Machine. We all know that just ain't so . . . We got Chapter 10 . . . components gotta fit together.

Then Verplank's stroke gets trotted out as a model for the Snap after all this discussion of a smaller wheel is gonna "out-drive all your playing partners" post 37 . . . Verplank don't seem to be out-driving many of his partners unless he's paired with the bottom 3 every time . . . Sticking your head over your right foot and moving backward and having a sexy angle don't equate to far . . . but he's got diabetes . . . so I got a bogus argument . . just sayin'.

Exactly - Young Schaeffer had more hand speed, pivot speed, and suppleness than Verplank, and unreal lag - at 1:41 his hands are almost mid-body and the shaft is curved upwards, well above horizontal. This all gives a more dynamic look(whiplash) and more power. Scott simply doesn't have the physical equipment to do this, so he maximizes his clubhead speed by playing his hole card, the late release.

I've read that Bobby has snapped ultra-stiff XXX shafts!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grPppCol6_M

An older, less dynamic Schaeffer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1T4zRiRSBI