LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - 10-2B vs. 10-2D
Thread: 10-2B vs. 10-2D
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 02-11-2005, 09:41 AM
EdZ EdZ is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Linn, OR
Posts: 1,645
Certainly for swingers, yes I would agree you can use a much broader range of options.

But why 10-2B for hitters? I would think at least for cross line motion, D would provide good 'insurance' against throw away, help with the angled hinge fade, as well as being more 'anatomical'. I supposed the real issue is that it is quite difficult to really classify grips, since the slightest adjustment can and does make major differences along the chain.

As a suggestion, I would love to see an 'examples' section on the site, with pics of each type using current tour players if possible, or even a 'patterns' section, listing out the approximate pattern of some noted players. It would be a valuable tool for the site IMO.
__________________
"Support the On Plane Swinging Force in Balance"

"we have no friends, we have no enemies, we have only teachers"

Simplicity buffs, see 5-0, 1-L, 2-0 A and B 10-2-B, 4-D, 6B-1D, 6-B-3-0-1, 6-C-1, 6-E-2
Reply With Quote